преданья старины глубокой
Jul. 10th, 2025 09:50 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Шаря по своему компу, обнаружил фотки 2005-го года; дело было в марте. Так что больше 20 лет. Я тогда увольнялся. А чо? Да я б в Борланде и дальше сидел, но это было очень глупо. 7 лет на одной должности простого инженера (а что я им всю инфраструктуру локализации зафигачил - это как? А никак. Блат нужен) и на студенческой зарплате, 80 тыс. Так что в конце концов ушёл. И вот мы тут отмечали это дело, в ресторане на вершине горы. Это если вы из Сан Хосе едете в Санта Круз, то вот самая вершина, и там два ресторана; старый и новый. Старый так себе, а новый был норм. Он был новый в 2005-м году.
Слева: Лена Бершадская, потом одна хорошая женщина забыл как звать, потом я, потом Крис Щинг, дальше не знаю.
Справа (слева направо): не помню, кто такой (новенький); Джулия Ли, Хенни Лин, Сандип (индийский принц), одна новая китаянка (имя забыл), Лиу Швэ (капитан китайской армии), Влад Протасов, Зоя Салистра.
Тут я одной правой наяриваю "entertainer". Ресторан с инструментом, э. А я тогда... Ладно.
Вот мы тут все ещё раз. Справа от меня Фред Меркурио.
Вообще можно было бы и восстановить имена. У меня где-то лежит телефонная книга Борланда за тот год.
(no subject)
Jul. 10th, 2025 06:16 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HnfI3P0pyMg
Про Израиль с точки зрения израильского лево-либерального активиста:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fg7JEjjcF4U&t
Судебная эпопея
Jul. 9th, 2025 12:30 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Око за око
Jul. 8th, 2025 07:59 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
стосовно буденного
Jul. 8th, 2025 07:51 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Так і сьогодні вночі. Щось було не так, погано щось. Але сили на встати, промірятися або навіть розбудити Петровича, - не було, тільки дихати. Прийшлося робити це досить довго, поки не відчула, що попустило.
Вранці хотіла іти "в поле", але внутрішній безлад не дав. Слабкість. Сіла виймати кісточки з вишень. Потім вибрала торішні ягоди кизилу і змішала їх з нарізаними яблуками. Яблук білого наливу зі старої яблуні падає багато. Покипіли - відставила, завтра доварю і закатаю, як благополучно. Бо заболів мій стеноз, прийшлося пити пігулку. Попустило.
Вчора поливала, то сьогодні можна пропустить, хоча спека пекельна. Як благополучно, то завтра зрання зроблю. А для цього треба зробити заготовки на салат і картоплю. Молоду вже копаємо. Картопля хороша, крупна. Ну, в серпні подивимось на врожай.
Завтра як зумію, то поллю і буряк, бо він потерпає, треба б і обгорнути, але тут як карта ляже. Точніше, як здоров'я. Бо щось воно не дуже.
Життя прекрасне, дожити б до перемоги.
Light, dark, light again
Jul. 8th, 2025 01:03 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Death
Life again
Обстріл
Обмін
Обстріл
Падай
І вставай
https://youtu.be/14NvwgZhzSI?si=hscaGNVhGprp7VrT
THE NET
Jul. 7th, 2025 06:14 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)

Me: Gruh, that was 1995?
(Rummaging around in digital archives.)
Me: Stop your grinnin' and drop your linen. The movie starts at 10pm. Let's go.
(0:00 in.)
Matt: Here comes the MIDI brass!
Me: Ooo! Intriguing music for such an awful movie.
(0:05 in.)
Me: Faaake! MacOS did not use "/" as a folder separator! My disbelief is throughly de-suspended.
Matt: Oh believe me, that won't be the least accurate thing in this movie.
Me: Oh yeaaah the online the pizza order...
Matt: Fun fact, Sandra Bullock really was one of the earliest proponents of Internet food ordering.
Me: That was like, already a combination of really cool and really wanky, even then. Also: No one eats like that, and looks like her.
(0:15 in.)
Matt: Oh look, a small aircraft at a critical plot point, I wonder what will happen.
Me: Yeah there's no reason we'd be seeing this unless...
(KABOOOOM)
Me: Yeah there it is.
Matt: That wasn't the tower he was supposed to contact. And also that's not what we meant by contact.
(0:20 in. Sandra is on the beach, with a laptop. An older guy is nearby, also on a laptop.)
Me: This guy is a villain, right?
Matt: WHAT GAVE IT AWAY
Me: The hair.
(0:25 in.)
Me: Okay, so, uh, DOES THIS MOVIE ACTUALLY HAVE A PLOT? We're almost 25 minutes in, and so far it does not.
Matt: Maybe it's one of the special features on the DVD.
(0:29 in.)
Me: At what point does she use her super hax0r skills to not get murdered at sea?
Matt: Well... I think she plays snake on her phone with a hacked skill level to avoid getting bored out of her mind.
Me: Wait; he unloaded the gun and put it away below decks after killing that guy, but now he's going down to get it, even though the plan was to kill her the whole time?
Matt: Don't overthink it. He clearly didn't.
(0:31 in. Sandra and the creepy guy are making out.)
Me: Okay, NOW THEY'RE PLAYING "SNAKE". AM I RIGHT PEOPLE?
Matt: Looks more like Tetris to me.
(0:35 in. The camera is focusing on the villain's lips. They fill the screen as he talks.)
Me: Mr. Winkler made a dumb decision with those close-ups. That was like, "student project" directing.
Matt: Yeah, I think that editing was considered edgy for the '90s. But what it really looks like to me is somebody who mostly shot for TV.
Me: I'm enjoying the fact that I can google stuff about this movie while watching it. Me from 1995 would find that hilarious.
(0:49 in. Sandra is running from the law, and meets up with Dennis Miller.)
Matt: And there he is!
Me: You know, I kinda forgot, 1995 Sandra is not actually a very good actor. She has two modes: Slightly checked-out, or panicked motormouth.
Matt: Dialogue can be written for her, and she looks good on camera, but yeah, it's not the same thing.
Me: Dennis Miller isn't great either, but for a totally different reason. I mean, he's very natural, but that's because he's not acting. He's just being Dennis Miller.
(0:53 in.)
Me: Tell me Dennis ad-libbed that toilet line.
Matt: I feel like he either did it as a formal rewrite or ad-libbed it, yeah. Because that clearly didn't come out of the rest of these writers.
Me: AGREED. So, is he gonna get killed in like 35 seconds?
(1:00 in.)
Me: Awwww, they had to actually spell out IRL!
Matt: "You know what would help, Sandra, is if you just like read the screen out loud, because most people who go to see hacker movies can't actually read. Our focus group thinks this is what it will take."
Me: "Also, while you read it, we're going to film your lips moving. Right up close. Try not to think about it."
(1:02 in. Dennis has just been poisoned.)
Me: Okay it took longer than 35 seconds, but he is going to die, right?
Matt: I honestly can't remember.
(Sandra is using stolen hacking software to look something up in hospital's medical records.)
Me: Hold on. You looked at a record on the internet, and used that as confirmation that the last record you saw on the internet was fake? Now that's just dumb.
Matt: IT WAS A SIMPLER TIME.
(1:07. Dennis is being poisoned again, but worse.)
Me: Awww Dennis. I knew you were gonna die as soon as you walked on-screen.
(1:15 in. Sandra has just yanked an old computer monitor off a desk. It shatters on the floor.)
Matt: Now I don't know about you, but I've dropped a few CRTs from a second floor, and those things don't shatter that easy.
(1:20 in. Sandra is being chased by cops for driving a stolen car.)
Me: Okay, so Sandra has like, 20 minutes to turn this all around. And so far she's done nothing but ask a couple of guys for help, and run from people. Now both the guys are dead and she's in jail. When are we going to see some h4x0r skills?
(1:25 in. Sandra has just crashed another car and is running from a fake FBI agent.)
Me: ... Okay now Sandra has less than 15 minutes to turn this all around.
(1:33 in. Sandra has finally decided to infiltrate the headquarters of the company pursuing her.)
Me: Cathedral, Inc! We do software security like gangbusters, but we don't lock our doors, and we don't have a front desk! No one has a badge, no one asks who you are, there are no security cameras, and we never log out of our machines when we leave!
(1:36 in. Columns of numbers are zipping around on the screen.)
Matt: Nice. A subnet octet greater than 255. I wonder if somebody was thinking that was like the "555-1212" of the internet.
Me: Yeah that was .... a whole lot of confusing.
(1:42 in.)
Matt: Oh here it is, here it is! The theme scene for the whole film! Wait fooor iiiiit...
(Sandra attempts to put a 3.5" disk into a drive but shoves it in upside down. It jams. She pulls it back out and turns it over.)
Matt: Ta daaa! Did you catch that?
Me: "That's the take we'll use!"
(1:46 in. Sandra has just restored her entire digital life by pressing one key.)
Matt: And there you go.
Me: It just ends?
Matt: What did you think?
Me: Well, to start, I'm glad I didn't watch that movie 30 years ago. Because honestly it's better as a horrendous time capsule, and by "better", what I mean is, less than completely intolerable.
(The credits are finally rolling.)
Me: "Adam Winkler" as "COMPUTER NERD". Hey, there are like 4 Winklers in this cast.
Matt: Yeah they got Winklered to hell.
Me: Very Winklery.
стосовно дивного
Jul. 6th, 2025 06:43 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Проводжала Петровича у відрядження, складала так званий "сидорчик": кілька шматків яблучного пирога, а зверху у серветках пара бутербродів з сиром. Петрович , приїхавши, стверджує, що ніяких бутербродів у котейнері не було. ВЗАГАЛІ. Але, якби я їх виклала і забула про це, то вони залишились би на столі в кухні, або деінде. Але бутерів не було ніде. Петрович продовжує стверджувати, що я їх залишила собі і з'їла.
Сьогодні вранці іду до церкви і бачу свого Персика, що йде по алєйці прямо на мене десь на відстані метрів двадцяти. Худий, але дуже схожий. Покиськала, він злякався і пірнув у траву, що від мене зліва, далі шосейка. Пуста, ні машин, ні котів там не було, трава не дуже висока, невдовзі косили. Прискорюю кроки і доходжу до того місця, сподіваюсь, що кіт просто сховався. Але в траві ніде не було нічого і нікого. Ніхто дорогу не перетинав. Кіт зник, наче примара.
От і що це було?
Well this is a new low for the SSA
Jul. 3rd, 2025 09:01 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I just received an unsolicited email from the Social Security Administration.

The Social Security Administration (SSA) is celebrating the passage of the One Big, Beautiful Bill, a landmark piece of legislation that delivers long-awaited tax relief to millions of older Americans.
The bill ensures that nearly 90% of Social Security beneficiaries will no longer pay federal income taxes on their benefits, providing meaningful and immediate relief to seniors who have spent a lifetime contributing to our nation's economy.
“This is a historic step forward for America’s seniors,” said Social Security Commissioner Frank Bisignano. ...
So naturally I did what any sensible citizen would, and went to https://secure.ssa.gov/oig/fraud/ and reported The Social Security Administration to The Social Security Administration for committing waste and abuse.
I'm reporting waste and abuse. The waste and abuse was perpetrated by you.
The email you just sent out to millions of people titled "Social Security Applauds Passage of Legislation Providing Historic Tax Relief for Seniors" was inappropriately partisan while also being a distortion of the truth about the legislation's content. It does not actually grant the tax exemption you claim it does!!
Political statements have ZERO PLACE in this office's communications. Don’t corrupt this department with empty platitudes praising ANY administration. The president is not your department's master, it's the constitution, and the American people behind that document. Your communications should NOT BE POLITICAL. I mean, dang, any eighth grader who's taken a civics class would know that. Now return the money of mine that you just wasted through your fraud and abuse of this system.
Now with any luck they'll get off my lawn.
(no subject)
Jul. 3rd, 2025 08:35 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
https://www.facebook.com/amightygirl/posts/pfbid02tBhfGhcM6VHFiLgvWztvY7S9edDwysf7onpV5FmD4QaKQKFsjCUugU7yDQ8xgnLEl
маск і емпатія
Jul. 2nd, 2025 11:08 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
У світлі жахливих новин про реверс поставок зброї в Україну, дивлюся всякі новини, і від агрегаторів, і від провайдерiв. Про таку "дрібничку", як чергова зрада і підстава в гарячій війні на передніх сторінках -- ні чичирк, треба спеціально шукати. Добре хоч, трохи про ідіотський фінансовий законопроект щось пишуть, і то, більше фокусу на драму того, як вони там за нього голосують і дотичні моменти про те, що "ой, вони самі не знають, що в тому законі". Але таке враження, що основна сьогоднішня, це суд на чорним музичним продюсером, який десятиліттями влаштовував нарко-сексо-оргії і чергові пусті заяви про чергові сексо-записи від трампівської
Вже не знаю, що насправді мав на увазі Маск, але таке враження, що то, як шурока публіка споживає новини зокрема і інформацію про світ взагалі, справді, є серйозним експлойтом наших рефлекторних емпатичних реакцій. З приводу чого можу лише повторити свою давню позицію: емпатія -- не так, щоби щось хороше, і очікувати, а тим більше вимагати її від інших, не варто. Тут є лінгвістичний момент: Я пишу про емпатію як фізіологічну здатність, а не про рефлексію. Про те, щоби автоматично відчувати емоції інших людей, а не про те, щоби не нехтувати цими емоціями, незалежно від того, як ти про них дізнався.
UPDATE:
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
A three year old prediction about the Ukraine conflict
Jul. 1st, 2025 01:46 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
In March of 2022 I made the following guess about the eventual outcome of Russia's Ukraine invasion:

Russia will blast Ukraine into powder, extract some concession like "we won't join NATO and those new republics are not part of Ukraine", then pull back into the republics, leaving them bristling with hardware for years. The Russian economy will burn low for a long while during which they will be at the mercy of the Chinese and whatever belt-and-road-style economic devil's bargain they care to name. Animosity between Europe and Russia, the US and Russia, will remain high for a decade, accomplishing nothing.
Ukraine will remain a depopulated ruin for at least that long. The EU will turn up its nose, sensing another debtor country like Greece. Putin will die or ""step down"" in something like five years, probably less, and his replacement will try and turn the page with the West, but without internal reforms the hands that are extended will all be those of the same old oligarchs and the Russian people will continue to be screwed for another generation, continue to be susceptible to jingoism and propaganda, and will lean even harder into the Chinese philosophy of governance: Not a government of, by, and for the people, but a people of, by, and for the government (by swordpoint if necessary).
This guess was mostly about stagnation. I figured the situation would not change for years, even as more people died and more hardware was thrown at both sides. This has come true, though there are some external consequences: NATO is re-arming and growing more independent, and Russia's ostensible allies are taking advantage of their economy being leveraged out over a financial abyss.
I set a limit of five years, which was a bit arbitrary, but I'm rolling with it. I think we're still headed for this state of affairs two years from now and there's only one thing that could realistically alter the course: Russia's economy going into a complete tailspin, before Putin's death.
If that happens, the Russian people might, maybe, get so sick of total war and sending their sons into a meat grinder that they strike Moscow hard enough to put a crack in the state oligarchy. But if I'm honest, this is unlikely. Never underestimate the capacity of Russian people to suffer.